In recent years, the concept of "cash for work" has gained popularity as a possible solution to unemployment and poverty in a variety of countries. This technique entails providing those in need with temporary employment opportunities, allowing them to earn money by engaging in public projects or community-based activities. In the context of Sri Lanka, the question is whether cash for work is permitted, and what the benefits and drawbacks are for the country's economy and society. This blog explores into the subject in order to throw light on it.
Cash for Work in Sri Lanka: Is it Legal?
Advantages of Cash for
Work in Sri Lanka:
- Poverty Alleviation: Individuals living in poverty or enduring
financial difficulties may benefit from cash for work initiatives. This
can assist them in meeting their current demands while also improving
their overall well-being.
- Skill Enhancement: Participants in pay for work programs can learn new skills and receive real work experience, improving their long-term employability. When the temporary program ends, this may lead to better work chances.
- Infrastructure Development: These programs frequently include
participants in projects that help to develop public infrastructure and
community assets. This can result in better local facilities and living
circumstances.
- Social Cohesion: Cash for work programs can build a sense of
community and camaraderie. Working together on a same purpose can help
foster social cohesion and a sense of belonging.
.jpg)
- Quick Response to Crises: Cash for work programs can be quickly
implemented in response to crises such as natural disasters or economic
shocks. This rapid response can provide immediate relief to affected
populations.
Disadvantages of Cash for
Work in Sri Lanka:
- Short-Term Impact: While cash for work programs provide temporary
relief, they do not necessarily address the root causes of unemployment
and poverty. Long-term sustainable solutions are needed to create lasting
change.
- Dependency: There is a risk that participants might become dependent
on these programs, leading to a lack of motivation to seek more stable and
permanent employment opportunities.
- Sustainability: Cash for work programs are often funded by external
sources, and their sustainability can be uncertain. If funding runs out,
participants may find themselves back in their initial vulnerable state.
- Quality of Work: The nature of the work provided in these programs
might not always align with participants' skills and expertise. This could
lead to suboptimal project outcomes.
- Selection Bias: Determining who qualifies for these programs can be
challenging and may lead to unfairness or exclusion of those in need.
- Benefits and Health & safety risks: These programmes specially
if it is an infrastructure programme can run even for several years but do
not provide for or include any insurance protection, provident benefits,
health covers or any of those employer obligations that a short term or
contractual job should include.
Personal reflection:
As I reflect on the
concept of cash for work programs in Sri Lanka, it becomes evident that these
initiatives hold both promise and limitations. Having witnessed the impact of
such programs firsthand, I recognize their immediate benefits, especially for
individuals facing crises or residing in marginalized communities. These
programs can indeed provide a lifeline during times of need, offering temporary
relief from financial hardships.
However, my observations
also show that pay for work initiatives fall short of providing a complete
solution to the greater concerns of unemployment and poverty. They provide
temporary employment, and while they provide a short-term respite, they do not
address the underlying structural issues that perpetuate these difficulties. I
have seen how people may become reliant on these programs, creating a cycle of
dependency rather than empowerment.
I have learned the value
of a diversified approach from encounters with program participants. A
concerted effort is required to truly alter the lives of individuals in need.
This involves both short-term interventions like cash for work programs and
long-term solutions like creating new job possibilities, investing in skill
development, and enacting broader economic changes.
The effectiveness of pay
for work programs is dependent on thorough planning and execution. Their
effectiveness, in my opinion, depends in their incorporation into a larger
framework of sustainable development initiatives. Seeing the potential of these
initiatives has reaffirmed my belief in the need of balancing instant treatment
with long-term improvement.
Finally, my own
experiences demonstrate the efficacy of pay for work programs as a temporary
remedy to address immediate issues. They must, however, be viewed as part of a
larger picture. We may work towards a future where unemployment and poverty are
truly and sustainably addressed by combining targeted interventions with
broader systemic improvements.
References:
- Ministry of
Labour Relations and Foreign Employement (2006). National Policy for Decent work
in Sri Lanka [pdf] Available from: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@asia/@ro-bangkok/@ilo-colombo/documents/publication/wcms_114045.pdf
[Accessed on 17 August 2023].
- Janen, S. Sivakumar, S. (2014). Implementation of Cash for Work Program for Post Disaster Emergency Recovery Process Based on Experience in Post War Resettlement Process through Emergency Northern Recovery Project of Sri Lankan [pdf] Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259972463_Implementation_of_Cash_for_Work_Program_for_Post_Disaster_Emergency_Recovery_Process_Based_on_Experience_in_Post_War_Resettlement_Process_through_Emergency_Northern_Recovery_Project_of_Sri_Lankan [Accessed on 17 August 2023].
Hi Shalomi,
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that CFW programs can be a valuable tool for poverty alleviation and social cohesion. However, I also believe that it is important to carefully design and implement these programs in order to minimize the risks of dependency and sustainability challenges.
I think your point about the need for a diversified approach to addressing unemployment and poverty is well-made. CFW programs can be a part of the solution, but they are not the only solution. We need to invest in a range of interventions, including job creation, skill development, and economic reforms. I appreciate your personal reflection on the CFW program in Sri Lanka. It is clear you have seen firsthand the impact of these programs on the lives of individuals and communities. This gives the article a valuable perspective that is often missing from academic discussions of CFW programs.
Thank you for your considerate response. I entirely agree with your assessment on the significance of carefully planning and implementing CFW (Cash-for-Work) programs to reduce possible hazards such as dependency and sustainability issues. It is critical to achieve a balance between short-term assistance and long-term growth.
DeleteYour emphasis on the importance of a multifaceted strategy to poverty and unemployment is right on. While CFW initiatives can bring immediate relief and contribute to social cohesiveness, they should only be one component of a larger approach. Investing in job creation, skill development, and economic transformation is critical for long-term poverty reduction. These complementing actions have the potential to address the underlying causes of unemployment and poverty, laying the way for long-term transformation. Your recognition of the importance of personal experiences in comprehending the impact of CFW programs is also welcomed. Indeed, real-world perspectives can provide valuable insights that academic discussions may overlook. These programs have a particular impact on the lives of individuals and communities, and it is critical to include these on-the-ground experiences when creating and evaluating poverty-relief projects.
Although I would like to believe CFW is disadvantages because it doesn't ensure a steady income, reading your article has helped me see differently. Now we see, especially after COVID that gen z rather than have permanent/ contract jobs they prefer the flexibility of consultant jobs. Reading your article I can also see CFW can supplement someone's income as a.part time job. Good job on your research.
ReplyDeleteThank you for expressing your thoughts, and I'm glad the article helped you view the potential benefits of Cash-for-Work (CFW) programs in a new light. Indeed, the changing nature of work has highlighted the appeal of flexible employment arrangements such as consulting or gig labor, particularly among younger generations such as Gen Z. CFW programs can be a beneficial supplement to someone's income, especially when people are looking for other sources of income or require more flexibility in their work schedules. They provide a chance to earn money on a temporary or part-time basis, which can be especially useful in situations where steady employment is difficult to come by.
DeleteYour statement emphasizes the necessity of acknowledging that the world of work is changing, and that people are increasingly seeking varied income streams and employment opportunities that fit their lifestyles and tastes. Individuals can participate in CFW programs while also contributing to community development and poverty alleviation. Thank you for your nice thoughts regarding the research, and I'm glad it helped you understand CFW programs and their potential benefits in today's shifting work situation.
Thank you for sharing this valuable information. Your expertise shines through, and I've learned so much from reading your post.
ReplyDeleteThank you Hisshanthi
DeleteThank you for sharing this valuable information. Your expertise shines through, and I've learned so much from reading your post.
ReplyDeleteThis is such an insightful and thought-provoking post! Appreciate the unique perspective you bring to the topic.
ReplyDeleteThe "Cash for Work" option is a form of short-term employment program where individuals are provided with temporary work opportunities in exchange for wages or cash payments. This approach is often used to address immediate employment needs, stimulate local economies, and provide financial support to vulnerable populations. In the context of Sri Lanka, Cash for Work programs can be implemented to address various challenges, such as post-disaster recovery, poverty alleviation, and community development. Advantages and disadvantages are also well mentioned. A good article
ReplyDeleteThank you for your input, and I'm happy to hear that you found the article's overview on Cash-for-Work programs to be useful and well-rounded. Indeed, Cash-for-Work programs are useful short-term employment solutions that play an important role in tackling many difficulties, particularly in Sri Lanka. These initiatives can be useful tools for immediate job creation, stimulating local economies, and giving much-needed financial assistance to disadvantaged communities, whether they are assisting in post-disaster recovery, supporting poverty alleviation efforts, or fostering community development.
DeleteI appreciate your acknowledgment of the article's analysis of both the benefits and drawbacks of Cash-for-Work programs. To maximize the good impact of these programs while addressing potential problems, it is critical to have a balanced view of them.
This is a very interesting topic which many have not addressed. The disadvantage of this would be focusing on short-term issues providing employment but it is not a permanent solution for unemployment. However, a skilled workforce would be created and people could earn cash through this process at least for a short time duration.
ReplyDeleteAn updated version of this would be online freelancing as per the article by Galpaya et. al (2018). Microwork and part-time work have been promoted in Sri Lanka for people to earn some cash during a project. It states that it would be different than working in an office but they can do this as full-time freelancers. Can you explain whether this also comes under "cash for work" option in Sri Lanka?
Thank you for your intelligent comment and for bringing up the idea of online freelancing and microwork as a modern alternative to traditional employment, particularly in Sri Lanka. Your comment concerning Cash-for-Work (CFW) programs' potential short-term focus is correct, and it's critical to remember that these programs often provide temporary employment to address acute needs, such as poverty relief during crises or community development initiatives.
DeleteAs stated in the article by Galpaya et al. (2018), online freelancing does represent a more current approach to income production and can be viewed as a type of "cash for work" in a digital setting. While it does not match the typical CFW model, it is comparable in that it allows people to earn money for tasks or services they give. Individuals with online freelancing opportunities can work remotely and on a flexible basis on a variety of assignments.
One significant difference between traditional CFW programs and online freelancing is that online freelancing frequently incorporates a greater range of talents and services. Freelancers can provide expertise in industries such as graphic design, writing, coding, and more, making it ideal for people with specific abilities.
In essence, both online freelancing and CFW programs strive to give people with possibilities to make money, but they do so in different ways. While CFW frequently targets unskilled or semi-skilled labor for short-term work, online freelancing allows individuals to demonstrate their skills and provide services to a diverse spectrum of consumers.
Finally, all techniques contribute to resolving unemployment and income generation, and they can coexist as part of a well-rounded economic empowerment strategy. Adapting to the changing nature of work and exploring alternative possibilities to create meaningful and sustainable economic opportunities for individuals in diverse contexts, including Sri Lanka, is critical. I hope I have answered your question.
Your reflection on cash for work programs in Sri Lanka offers valuable insights into their potential and limitations. These programs provide temporary relief for individuals in crises or marginalized communities, but do not address the root causes of unemployment and poverty. A diversified approach is essential, combining short-term interventions with long-term solutions like job creation, skill development, and economic changes. Emphasizing the importance of meticulous planning and execution, your blog post highlights the practical efficacy of these programs in addressing immediate issues but calls for a holistic approach. Your vision for a sustainable future involving targeted interventions and systemic improvements is inspiring.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your thoughtful and intelligent response. I'm glad you found the reflection on cash-for-work programs in Sri Lanka useful, and that you agree with the necessity for a comprehensive strategy to solving unemployment and poverty.
DeleteYou've perfectly captured the essence of the discussion. While cash-for-work programs can give critical short-term respite and quick employment prospects for persons in crisis or marginalized groups, they do not address the underlying causes of these complicated situations. The key to long-term progress is a multifaceted approach that mixes short-term interventions with long-term answers. This bigger strategy relies heavily on job creation, skill development, and economic reforms.
Your emphasis on careful planning and execution is correct. Effective implementation is critical to ensuring that these initiatives not only address immediate difficulties but also contribute to long-term beneficial change in individuals' and communities' lives. I'm delighted that you find the vision for a sustainable future, which includes targeted interventions and systemic reforms, motivating.
This blog provides a comprehensive examination of the "cash for work" approach in Sri Lanka, highlighting its advantages and disadvantages. The article effectively captures the potential benefits, such as poverty alleviation, skill enhancement, and quick crisis response, while also addressing the drawbacks, including short-term impact, dependency, and sustainability challenges. The personal reflection adds depth, underscoring the nuanced nature of these programs. The author's insights about the need for a balanced and diversified approach to tackle unemployment and poverty are thought-provoking. This well-rounded analysis contributes to the understanding of the complexities surrounding such initiatives in Sri Lanka's context.
ReplyDeleteIndeed, it is critical to acknowledge both the possible benefits, such as poverty alleviation, skill building, and speedy reaction to emergencies, as well as the problems, such as their short-term nature and the risk of dependency. The article's personal commentary tries to provide a more in-depth knowledge of the real-world impact and complications involved with these programs.
DeleteI appreciate your recognition of the importance of a balanced and diverse approach to addressing unemployment and poverty, which is a fundamental subject in the debate. The problems posed by these concerns are multifaceted, and a comprehensive plan combining short-term alleviation with long-term answers is required for long-term improvement.
Your comment is invaluable, and I'm delighted that the research adds to a deeper understanding of the complexity surrounding efforts such as "cash for work" in the context of Sri Lanka. Please contribute any other thoughts or questions you have on this subject. Thank you for reading the content and contributing to the discussion of these important issues.
Very informative article. The "Cash for Work" option in Sri Lanka is a new approach to addressing socio-economic challenges. By providing individuals with opportunities to engage in temporary employment, this initiative not only offers financial support but also contributes to community development. This forward-thinking approach reflects a commitment to both short-term relief and long-term progress, exemplifying the potential for creative solutions to drive positive change.
ReplyDeleteIndeed, these programs provide a distinct combination of short-term alleviation and long-term progress. They not only give individuals with financial assistance, but they also actively contribute to community development, building a sense of empowerment and self-reliance among members.
DeleteYour response emphasizes the necessity of innovative solutions to complicated situations such as unemployment and poverty. It's encouraging to see efforts that address both current needs and long-term, sustainable improvements, demonstrating a commitment to holistic development.
Please contribute any other views or questions you have about this issue. Your participation is greatly appreciated, and it is through these dialogues that we may continue to investigate novel approaches to good change.
Good article with real-life examples and an interesting reading. In Sri Lanka, the Cash for Work approach is giving people temporary employment opportunities, especially in post-disaster or development situations, in order to meet both urgent cash requirements and social growth. This strategy has benefits like quick cash flows into poor groups, which may help local economies (Harris, M., & Sebstad, 2010). Additionally, it helps participants strengthen their skills and capacities, which may improve their long-term employability (ILO, 2015). The method has drawbacks, though, including the potential for dependency on emergency relief measures, the possibility of corruption in the selection procedures, and difficulties sustaining projects after their initial duration (International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, 2008). Coordinating with stakeholders and ensuring sufficient project design, communication, and organization is vital to optimize the benefits of this approach while mitigating its potential drawbacks.
ReplyDeleteYou've clearly articulated the essence of the "Cash for Work" program in Sri Lanka. It is, after all, a method that solves both immediate cash needs and contributes to social and economic growth, especially in the aftermath of disasters or during development initiatives. The advantages you've mentioned, such as providing immediate cash to underrepresented groups while also improving participants' skills and employability in the long run, reflect the varied character of these programs.
DeleteYou've also correctly identified the potential negatives, such as reliance on emergency relief methods, corruption threats, and the difficulty of sustaining initiatives beyond their initial period. These are critical factors that must be carefully considered during the planning and execution of Cash for Work initiatives.
Your emphasis on the significance of stakeholder cooperation and the necessity for effective project design, communication, and organization is spot-on. Collaboration and precise planning are essential for maximizing the benefits while minimizing the potential negatives of this method.
Thank you for adding to the debate with these insightful observations and references.
The article itself is very insightful! Your analysis of the benefits and drawbacks of the "Cash for Work" strategy in Sri Lanka is in line with the Harvard Business Review's emphasis on finding reasonable solutions to challenging problems (The Art of Implementation by Robert S. Kaplan and Norton David P., 2005). The HBR article explains how a combination of procedures, systems, and people are necessary for successful implementation, which is in line with how your comments highlight the necessity for a diverse strategy. What impact do you think stakeholder coordination will have on Sri Lanka's 'Cash for Work' strategy's effectiveness?
ReplyDeleteYou've correctly highlighted the significance of Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton's approach to finding reasonable answers to difficult problems, highlighting that effective implementation necessitates a combination of procedures, systems, and people. This is consistent with the article's discussion of the necessity for a broad and well-coordinated strategy to address the difficulties of unemployment and poverty.
DeleteIn response to your question about the impact of stakeholder coordination on the effectiveness of Sri Lanka's 'Cash for Work' strategy, it is an important aspect in determining the success of such programs. Coordination with stakeholders such as government agencies, non-governmental organizations, local communities, and international organizations can have a number of positive effects:
1. Collaboration can result in better resource allocation and mobilization, ensuring that the program gets the necessary financing and support for implementation.
2. Stakeholder Engagement Allows for a Better knowledge of Local Needs and Priorities: Stakeholder engagement allows for a better knowledge of local needs and priorities, ensuring that program activities are tailored to the specific context and are more likely to have a beneficial impact.
3. Transparency and Accountability: Involving diverse stakeholders in program execution can improve transparency and accountability, lowering the risk of corruption and mismanagement.
4. Community Involvement: Involving local communities in decision-making can generate a sense of ownership and dedication to the program, boosting its chances of success and sustainability.
5. Collaboration with multiple stakeholders can encourage information sharing and best practices, allowing the program to benefit from lessons experienced in comparable initiatives.
To summarize, good stakeholder coordination is critical to maximizing the effectiveness of Sri Lanka's 'Cash for Work' plan. It guarantees that the program is well-aligned with local needs, sufficiently resourced, transparent, and responsible, eventually contributing to the program's effectiveness in tackling unemployment and poverty while reducing potential downsides.
This blog provides a comprehensive analysis of the Cash for Work concept and highlights its advantages and disadvantages. Cash for Work (CfW) is a program that provides temporary employment to people in need in exchange for labor on community projects. It is a common poverty alleviation strategy in Sri Lanka and other developing countries. Furthermore, It's a source of income and food security for those in poverty. By providing the income to low income households, Community financial assistance schemes can contribute to reducing poverty. Expenditure on food, paying for school fees and other essential expenses may be covered from this income.
ReplyDeleteYour insights illuminate the value of such programs, particularly in the context of poverty eradication in Sri Lanka and other developing nations.
DeleteCFW initiatives do, in fact, provide a critical source of income and food security for the poor. These initiatives provide immediate help to low-income households by providing temporary work opportunities in exchange for labor on community projects. The cash generated by CFW initiatives has the potential to significantly improve the living situations of vulnerable communities.
As you indicated, the revenue from CFW can be used to cover a variety of important expenses, such as food, tuition fees, and other necessities. This not only solves current financial needs, but also promotes long-term well-being by increasing access to education and enhancing general quality of life.
Your statement emphasizes the complex nature of CFW programs, emphasizing their importance not only in alleviating poverty but also in improving food security and assisting with larger community development activities. Thank you for sharing these insightful observations, which add to the topic of the good impact of such programs in solving socioeconomic difficulties.
Absolutely fascinating article! The concept of Cash for Work in Sri Lanka seems like a brilliant approach to address unemployment while simultaneously contributing to local infrastructure development. It's heartwarming to see a program that not only provides much-needed income to individuals and families but also fosters a sense of community pride through their involvement in various projects. While challenges surely exist, the potential benefits this initiative offers to both individuals and the nation are truly inspiring. Kudos to Sri Lanka for exploring such a thoughtful and impactful solution!
ReplyDeleteThank you for your positive and supportive reaction to the article! It's lovely to hear that you found the Cash for Work concept in Sri Lanka fascinating and inspirational.
DeleteIndeed, Cash for Work programs have the potential to be a creative method to combating unemployment and poverty while also contributing to the development of local infrastructure. They not only give necessary income to individuals and families, but they also instill a feeling of community pride and engagement via involvement in worthwhile initiatives.
While problems are undoubtedly there, it is encouraging to see that you appreciate the huge potential benefits that this effort offers, both on an individual and national level. Sri Lanka's determination to pursue such meaningful and significant solutions is admirable.
Your comments of encouragement and support are much welcomed, as they highlight the relevance of novel approaches to complex social and economic concerns.
I enjoyed reading this Shalomi, especially your own experience on this topic. "Cash-for-work programs can be an effective tool to address immediate socio-economic challenges and promote community development. As you also emphasize, they are not a permanent solution.
ReplyDeleteFrom my point of view, poverty alleviation is one of the main benefits that this program has. Since these programs offer short-term solutions, I don't think that many people are motivated to look for more stable and permanent employment opportunities. This is also what you mentioned as one of the drawbacks of being dependent.
Do you think that there are any methods to motivate them and to make them less dependent on these "cash for work" programs? Have you practiced any kind of method and have you seen any results?
You make an important point concerning the possibility of becoming dependent on these programs due to their short-term nature. True, the temporary financial respite they provide may deter some people from actively seeking more stable and permanent employment possibilities, which can be a long-term solution to poverty.
DeleteAddressing the issue of dependency requires a multifaceted approach:
1. Skills Development: Integrating skill development and training into Cash-for-Work programs is one way. This can help participants learn new skills or improve existing ones, making them more competitive in the job market once the program is through.
2. Linkages to Employment Opportunities: Program organizers can make links with local employers or job placement services to help participants transition from Cash-for-Work programs to more steady employment.
3. Financial Literacy and Savings: Teaching participants about money management and encouraging them to save a portion of their earnings will help them achieve financial stability and independence.
4. Community Development: Emphasize the community development portion of these programs so that participants feel ownership and pride in the projects they work on. This may inspire individuals to continue contributing to the advancement of their communities after the program has ended.
Regarding your personal experience, I have seen several effective implementations of the following ideas in various Cash-for-Work initiatives. Participants who got skills training throughout the program, for example, generally found greater work opportunities thereafter. Furthermore, community-driven projects instilled in participants a sense of responsibility and incentive to continue working on community development activities beyond the program's completion. As my personal example, our organization was implemented a CFW project in Thammannawa in 2016 focused on canal cleaning and installing flood gates to address the recurring issue of flooding during the rainy season, which was causing damage to the paddy fields in the area.
During the project, community members actively participated in the Cash-for-Work program. They were engaged in cleaning the canal and installing the flood gates. Importantly, the community members performed their tasks effectively, contributing not only to the immediate goal of flood prevention but also to the sense of ownership and pride in the project.
What makes this example particularly noteworthy is the continued commitment of the community even after the project period ended. They recognized the value of canal cleaning and flood prevention, not just as a short-term job but as an essential practice for their community's well-being. As a result, they started coming together periodically to clean the canal, ensuring its maintenance and functionality. This ongoing practice demonstrates a sense of responsibility and community cohesion that was instilled during their participation in the Cash-for-Work program.
The case of Thammannawa serves as an excellent example of the community-driven approach to development. It highlights how such programs can not only achieve immediate objectives but also lead to sustainable changes in behavior and practices within communities. In this instance, the community's continued canal cleaning efforts show that they have embraced the importance of disaster preparedness and community resilience, making a positive impact on their livelihoods and the overall well-being of the area. It underscores the long-term benefits that thoughtful and well-implemented Cash-for-Work programs can bring to communities, extending far beyond their initial scope.
Absolutely fascinating read! It's wonderful to see innovative approaches like Cash for Work gaining traction in Sri Lanka. This option seems to offer a win-win solution by providing employment opportunities while contributing to local infrastructure projects. However, like any strategy, there are bound to be pros and cons. Kudos to the author for shedding light on both sides of the coin. Looking forward to more insightful articles like this!
ReplyDeleteThis article provides a comprehensive overview of the "cash for work" programs in Sri Lanka, exploring both their advantages and disadvantages. It's clear that these initiatives offer immediate relief to individuals facing crises or living in marginalised communities, which is commendable. However, as you've rightly pointed out, they may not address the deeper structural issues of unemployment and poverty, potentially leading to dependency.
ReplyDeleteHow can policymakers and organisations in Sri Lanka strike a balance between providing short-term relief through cash-for-work programs and implementing long-term solutions to tackle unemployment and poverty effectively?
You've highlighted an important point about the balance that authorities and organizations in Sri Lanka should strike between short-term relief and long-term solutions to successfully address unemployment and poverty.
DeleteTo achieve this balance, a diverse approach is required: Policymakers and organizations should adopt integrated policies that combine short-term relief with long-term development activities. Short-term relief programs, such as "cash for work," can provide urgent safety nets, but they must be linked to larger development projects focused on job creation, skill development, and economic changes.
Skills Development: Build skill development and training into cash-for-work programs. This provides participants with vital skills that will help them find work in the future. During the program, encouraging a focus on skill acquisition might empower individuals to pursue more stable jobs once the program ends.
Transition Assistance: Assist program participants with their transition. This could include connecting individuals with job placement services, making loans available for entrepreneurial initiatives, or encouraging savings and financial awareness. This type of assistance assists individuals in transitioning to more solid and sustainable sources of income.
Community Engagement: Encourage community ownership and participation in development activities. Communities that are involved are more likely to contribute to the long-term sustainability of programs and poverty reduction efforts. Encourage communities to take charge of their own development by engaging actively in decision-making and execution.
Monitoring and Evaluation: Monitor and evaluate the impact of cash-for-work programs and related long-term policies on a regular basis. This guarantees that the programs continue to be effective and adapt to changing conditions. Data-driven decision-making enables for adjustments to better suit the community's changing demands.
Policy Coordination: Encourage coordination across various government agencies, non-governmental groups, and international organizations in order to establish a unified and synergistic approach to poverty reduction. Collaboration can result in more comprehensive and long-term solutions.
Advocacy and public awareness: Educate the public on the necessity of both short-term alleviation and long-term development measures. Engage in lobbying activities to gain support for policies and programs that effectively strike this balance.
Striking the correct balance between short-term relief and long-term solutions is a difficult undertaking, but it is critical for achieving long-term poverty alleviation and effectively tackling unemployment in Sri Lanka. It necessitates a concerted effort, a focus on skill development, community engagement, and a commitment to monitoring and changing techniques as necessary.